The potential of sampling with partial replacement for fisheries surveys

15Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The methodology or Nicholson ei al (ICES CM 1991 D: 11, 9pp.) for comparing sampling with fixed and random stations is extended to the case of sampling with partial replacement. The conditions under which estimates of abundance and. more particularly, change in abundance based on fixed samples, will be more accurate than those based on sampling with partial replacement and under which the latter will be more accurate than those based on random sampling are derived. Research trawl data from NAFO Divisions 2J, 3K. and 3L for the years 1985-1991 (1985-1992 for 3L) are used to gain some idea of how the accuracy of estimates of changes based on the three strategies (fixed, random, and partial replacement) would compare under the assumption that the stations fixed between years are selected at random. In practice, purposive selection of the fixed stations is, of course, possible. © 1994 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warren, W. G. (1994). The potential of sampling with partial replacement for fisheries surveys. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 51(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1994.1032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free