DNA Ploidy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Comparison of Flow and Image Cytometry with Clinical Follow-Up in 93 Patients

14Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In soft tissue sarcoma, the prognostic importance of DNA ploidy status is limited. One possible explanation may be technical; small nondiploid stemlines will be diluted in relation to the presence of normal diploid cells and may not be detected by flow cytometry (FCM). We assessed DNA ploidy status in 93 tumors with both FCM and image cytometry (ICM). ICM may permit the exclusion of nonrelevant cells. The ability of the two methods to detect nondiploid stemlines was compared, as were the prognostic consequences. The patients (54 males) had a median age of 69 years. Surgical procedures were performed on all patients. None of the patients had received preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. FCM and ICM were performed with standard methods. The prognostic value was assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis. In 82 of the 93 tumors, a concordant ploidy status by FCM and ICM was found. In 5 FCM type 1-2 tumors (diploid), the identification of nondiploid stemlines by ICM did not influence the metastatic rates. Increasing tumor size, histotype other than liposarcoma, increasing malignancy grade, tumor necrosis, and ICM nondiploidy were univariate prognostic factors for metastasis. In a multivariate analysis, only tumor size larger than 9 cm was a prognostic factor. In about 10% of the tumors, a discrepancy between FCM and ICM ploidy status was found, but we could not find a consistent prognostic consequence of this. Neither FCM nor ICM ploidy status was an independent prognostic factor. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dreinhöfer, K. E., Baldetorp, B., Åkerman, M., Fernö, M., Rydholm, A., & Gustafson, P. (2002). DNA Ploidy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Comparison of Flow and Image Cytometry with Clinical Follow-Up in 93 Patients. Clinical Cytometry, 50(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.10034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free