Predictors of increased depressive symptoms in the postpartum period

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy and the postpartum period are a risk period in a woman’s life in terms of manifesting mental disorders, such as postpartum depression. Previous research has identified several risk factors affecting the onset and progression of postpartum depression. Aim: (1) to find the occurrence of depressive symptoms in the postpartum women group; (2) to verify the influence of selected factors on the level of postpartum depression. Materials and methods: Study sample consisted of 510 mothers in the postpartum period, mean age 30.6 years (±5.3; range 19–45 years). The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale was used to measure symptoms of depression; a questionnaire of our own design was used to assess selected factors potentially influencing level of depressive symptoms. Results: In the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale, the respondents achieved an average score of 9.3 ± 5.6; and the prevalence of severe depressive symptoms was 25.3%. The linear regression model showed that significant predictors of postpartum depression were: lower education; history of depression; dependence on the opinion of others; concerns about future; low satisfaction with motherhood; problems with partner; problems with breast-feeding; tearful child; negative emotions toward the baby; and poor mastering of maternity. Discussion: Significant predictors of postpartum depression identified in this study can be easily detected in clinical practice using the unique long-term contact that a woman has with her prenatal midwife. Evaluation of mothers’ emotional health and screening for postpartum depression risk factors can enable midwives to identify those at risk and intervene in a timely manner.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banovcinova, L., Skodova, Z., & Jakubcikova, K. (2019). Predictors of increased depressive symptoms in the postpartum period. Kontakt, 21(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2018.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free