Monitoring long-term efficacy of iron chelation therapy by deferiprone and desferrioxamine in patients with β-thalassaemia major: Application of SQUID biomagnetic liver susceptometry

101Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this non-randomized prospective study, liver and spleen iron concentrations were monitored annually over a 4-year period by non-invasive Superconducting Quantum Interference Device biomagnetometry in 54 β-thalassaemia major patients (age, 7-22 years) receiving treatment with deferiprone (75 mg/kg/d). Median liver iron concentrations increased significantly from 1456 to 2029 and 2449 μg/gliver at baseline, after 2.0 and 3.2 years respectively. Another group of 51 thalassaemic patients (aged 4-34 years) who received desferrioxamine s.c. for 1.9 years increased their liver iron concentration from 1076 to 1260 μg/gliver. Taking into account the increase of the daily iron input from transfusions of 3.6 mg/d, caused by weight gain in 67% of the patients treated with deferiprone, a larger total body iron elimination rate was achieved after 2 years than at baseline. A negative ferritin change was observed in 51% of the patients. In 15 nonsplenectomized patients, liver iron significantly increased from 1260 to 1937 μg/gliver (P < 0.01), but serum ferritin remained stable at 2100 μg/l, as did the spleen iron concentration at 1200 μg/gspleen. A two-compartment model may predict an average chelation efficacy for desferrioxamine and deferiprone, with a saturation effect of the latter, for a certain chelation and transfusion regimen by a single liver iron quantification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fischer, R., Longo, F., Nielsen, P., Engelhardt, R., Hider, R. C., & Piga, A. (2003). Monitoring long-term efficacy of iron chelation therapy by deferiprone and desferrioxamine in patients with β-thalassaemia major: Application of SQUID biomagnetic liver susceptometry. British Journal of Haematology, 121(6), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04297.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free