Resolving Rabin’s paradox

8Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present a theoretical model of Rabin’s famous calibration paradox that resolves confusions in the literature and that makes it possible to identify the causes of the paradox. Using suitable experimental stimuli, we show that the paradox truly violates expected utility and that it is caused by reference dependence. Rabin already showed that utility curvature alone cannot explain his paradox. We, more strongly, do not find any contribution of utility curvature to the explanation of the paradox. We find no contribution of probability weighting either. We conclude that Rabin’s paradox underscores the importance of reference dependence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bleichrodt, H., Doctor, J. N., Gao, Y., Li, C., Meeker, D., & Wakker, P. P. (2019). Resolving Rabin’s paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 59(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-019-09318-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free