Comparison of amine solutions performance for gas sweetening

18Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using different kinds of amines, in Fajr-e-Jam gas refinery, including mixed or activated amines, have provided the chance for better analysis of different kinds of amines performance. In the current work, the most important parameters in gas sweetening refineries such as amine circulation rate, steam consumption, CO2and mercaptan removal were investigated for sweetening trains utilizing diethanolamine (DEA), methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), DEA/MDEA and activated methyldiethanolamine (aMDEA). In the case of steam consumption and circulation rates, MDEA and aMDEA, show the less required rates to meet lean amine loadings. For CO2removal aMDEA has the best efficiency. In the case of mercaptan removal, DEA shows the best absorption rate compared with other three amines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abkhiz, V., & Heydari, I. (2014). Comparison of amine solutions performance for gas sweetening. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 9(5), 656–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.1795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free