Neo-Liberalism, police, and the governance of little urban things

22Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article seeks to refine understandings of the governmental logics that comprise and shape urban governance. Drawing on research using ethnographic methods that explore the business improvement district (BID) and the condominium corporation (condo) it is argued that exclusive focus on urban neo-liberalism neglects an urban "police." This latter logic is most famously remarked upon in Michel Foucault's writings as targeting "little things" in urban spaces. Both "police" and the "free rider problem" it confronts predate and are irreducible to neo-liberalism. Ethnography helps discern this "police" as well as how neo-liberalism relates to it in private urban realms typically hidden from view. Examining BIDs and condos in this way shows that neoliberalism and "police" co-exist and combine in the governance of urban residential and commercial life. This matters because it reveals a more complex picture of urban governance than is sometimes assumed when neo-liberalism is exclusively invoked and one that is necessarily considered when conceiving of alternative governing arrangements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lippert, R. K. (2014). Neo-Liberalism, police, and the governance of little urban things. Foucault Studies, (18), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i18.4651

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free