A Comprehensive Review of Non-Energy-Based Treatments for Atrophic Acne Scarring

32Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Scarring is a dire consequence of acne vulgaris. Particularly, atrophic acne scarring is highly prevalent among young adults, and its physical and psychological effects can persist throughout their lives if left untreated. This literature review will analyze various non-energy-based approaches to treating atrophic acne scarring, emphasizing recent advances within the last 5 to 10 years. To accomplish this, we performed a PubMed search for various acne scar treatments such as chemical peels, dermabrasion, micro-dermabrasion, subcision, microneedling, punch techniques, dermal fillers, and thread lifting. Our findings and analysis show that there is no panacean solution to treating atrophic acne scars, which explains the evolving trend towards developing unique combinatorial treatments. Although a fair comparison of each treatment approach is difficult to achieve due to the studies’ varying sample sizes, strength of evidence, treatment execution, etc, there still remains a level of consensus on what treatments are well suited for particular scar types.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tam, C., Khong, J., Tam, K., Vasilev, R., Wu, W., & Hazany, S. (2022). A Comprehensive Review of Non-Energy-Based Treatments for Atrophic Acne Scarring. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S350040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free