Assessment of 10-Year Major Osteoporotic and Femur Fracture Risk of Postmenopausal Women Using FRAX®

  • Demir A
  • Kutlu R
  • Civi S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess osteoporosis (OP) risk factors in postmenopausal women and 10-year major osteoporosis and femur facture risks using the World Health Organization's fracture risk assessment scale (FRAX®). Material and Methods: This cross-sectional analytic study was carried out on 340 postmenopausal women. Considering participant risk factors and bone mineral densities and using the FRAX® risk assessment scale, their 10-year major osteoporotic and femur fracture was assessed. Results: The mean age of the women in our study was 57.5±7.8. Of the participants, 47 (13.8%) were osteoporotic, 177 (52.1%) were osteopenic, and 116 (34.1%) were normal. As age increased, OP frequency increased (p<0.001), and as body mass index (BMI) increased, OP frequency decreased (p<0.001). Considering OP existence, there was a statistically significant relation between major OP risk and femur fracture risk, calculated using BMD and without using BMD (p<0.001). Major OP fracture risk, calculated using BMD, was low in 94.7% of the subjects, mild in 5.0%, and high in 0.3%. When osteoporosis risk factors were assessed, while OP frequency in those with 2 or fewer clinical risk factors (CRFs) was 12.8%, OP frequency was 28.0% in those with 3 or 4 risk factors. Conclusion: In this study, it was determined that the FRAX® risk assessment scale, which is used to assess 10-year OP fracture risk, is a significant, cost-efficient, easy-to-use assessment criterion whether BDM is applied or not. © 2014 by Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Demir, A., Kutlu, R., & Civi, S. (2014). Assessment of 10-Year Major Osteoporotic and Femur Fracture Risk of Postmenopausal Women Using FRAX®. Türkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 60(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.5152/tftrd.2014.78736

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free