Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in predominantly leuco- and thrombocytopenic haematologic/oncologic patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - A single-centre experience

19Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a frequent condition following pneumonia in immunocompromised cancer patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may serve as a rescue therapy in refractory ARDS but has still not been studied in predominantly leuco- and thrombocytopenic cancer patients. Patients and Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective, observational study, we assessed all cancer patients treated with ECMO for ARDS between 2013 and 2017. Results: 25 patients, 11 of whom underwent haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT), were analysed. The main reason for ARDS was pneumonia in 72%. All patients were under invasive ventilation at ECMO. All but 9/3 patients suffered from leuco-/thrombocytopenia due to anti-cancer treatment or underlying disease. Overall, 17 patients (68%) died on ECMO, whereas 5 patients survived to hospital discharge (20%). All patients after recent allogeneic (allo-)SCT have died. 4 patients experienced severe bleeding events. Conclusions: Discouraging survival rates in patients treated after allo-SCT do not support the use of ECMO for ARDS in this patient subgroup. On the contrary, cancer patients in at least stable disease otherwise eligible for full-code intensive care unit management, even those with severe thrombocytopenia, may be potential candidates for ECMO in case of severe ARDS failing conventional measures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stecher, S. S., Beyer, G., Goni, E., Tischer, J., Herold, T., Schulz, C., … Lippl, S. (2018). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in predominantly leuco- and thrombocytopenic haematologic/oncologic patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - A single-centre experience. Oncology Research and Treatment, 41(9), 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489718

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free