Reasons why women accept or reject the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) during pregnancy

70Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the reasons why pregnant women accept or reject the seasonal influenza vaccine. The qualitative descriptive design used a face-to-face semi-structured interview format. Sixty pregnant and postpartum women at two hospitals in the Northeastern United States participated. Content analysis was the inductive method used to code the data and identify emergent themes. Six themes emerged from the data: differing degrees of influence affect action to vaccinate; two-for-one benefit is a pivotal piece of knowledge that influences future vaccination; fear if I do (vaccinate), fear if I don't; women who verbalize 'no need' for the vaccine also fear the vaccine; a conveniently located venue for vaccination reduces barriers to uptake; H1N1-a benefit and barrier to the seasonal vaccine. Our study supports previous findings and reveals a deeper understanding and interpretation of the behavior and decision-making to accept or reject the influenza vaccine. Understanding the reasons behind the behavior of vaccine rejection gives us the chance to change it. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meharry, P. M., Colson, E. R., Grizas, A. P., Stiller, R., & Vázquez, M. (2013). Reasons why women accept or reject the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) during pregnancy. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(1), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-0957-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free