Abstract
Anecdotal evidence suggests that Burrowing Owls have declined in the state of Washington. We examined the status of these owls in agricultural and urban habitats to better understand the underlying causes of these declines. Nest density was higher in the area dominated by agriculture (0.67 nests/km 2) than in the urban area (0.28 nests/km2), and re-use of nest burrows was more common in the agricultural area. We found no difference in mean clutch size between the two areas, but nesting success was higher in the agricultural area. The mean number of fledglings per nesting attempt was higher in the agricultural area (2.02 vs. 1.47), but we found no difference between the two areas in the mean number of fledglings per successful nest (3.2 vs. 3.1). Both natal recruitment (4% vs. 8%) and annual return rate of adults (30% vs. 39%) were lower in the agricultural area than in the urban area, suggesting that the owl population in the agricultural area may not be stable and may be a "sink" population. Due to high burrow fidelity from year to year, and the tendency of some owls in Washington to overwinter, we recommend that legal protection of nest burrows be extended to the nonbreeding season. © 2006 Association of Field Ornithologists.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Conway, C. J., Garcia, V., Smith, M. D., Ellis, L. A., & Whitney, J. L. (2006). Comparative demography of Burrowing Owls in agricultural and urban landscapes in southeastern Washington. Journal of Field Ornithology. Blackwell Publishing Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00054.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.