A study comparing three different laser-assisted hatching techniques

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose of investigation: Laser-assisted hatching (LAH) is recognized as a useful technology to improve clinical pregnancy rates and implantation rates. This study reports the differences between a new LAH method and two conventional LAH techniques. Materials and Methods: The authors studied 151 patients with repeated implantation failure, who were divided into three groups. Results: In group 1, the zona pellucida (ZP) was opened using LAH (n = 52). In group 2, laser-assisted thinning was performed to dissolve the outer layer of the ZP (n = 49). In group 3, laser-assisted thinning was performed to dissolve the inner layer of the ZP (n = 50). The clinical pregnancy rates and implantation rates among the groups were compared. The results demonstrate that there are significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rates and implantation rates between group 3 and the other two groups. Conclusion: Performing laser-assisted thinning to dissolve the inner layer of the ZP markedly increases the pregnancy rates and implantation rates of patients with repeated implantation failure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, B., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, X. (2014). A study comparing three different laser-assisted hatching techniques. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, 41(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog16092014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free