Immediate versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving sunitinib (EORTC 30073 SURTIME)

  • Bex A
  • Mulders P
  • Jewett M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, mRCC patients with the primary tumour in situ are offered CN followed by targeted therapy. This randomized trial explored a period of targeted therapy (sunitinib) prior to CN as an alternative approach. Methods: Patients with mRCC were randomized 1:1 to immediate CN followed by sunitinib versus 3 cycles sunitinib followed by CN and sunitinib. Inclusion required histologically confirmed clear-cell subtype, resectable asymptomatic primary tumour and 0.99). The OS HR (stratified byWHOPS) of intention to treat (ITT) with deferred versus immediate CN in all patients was 0.57 (CI: 0.34 - 0.95, p=0.032) with a median OS of 32.4 (14.5-65.3) and 15.1 months (CI: 9.3, 29.5), respectively. Conclusions: The sequence of CN and sunitinib did not affect the PFR at 28 weeks. The sample size precludes definitive conclusions from other endpoints, although an OS signal was seen for deferred CN. CN after sunitinib appears safe. (Table Presented).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bex, A., Mulders, P., Jewett, M. A. S., Wagstaff, J., van Velthoven, R., Laguna Pes, P. M., … Haanen, J. B. (2017). Immediate versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving sunitinib (EORTC 30073 SURTIME). Annals of Oncology, 28, v622. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx440.030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free