Progesterone for the luteal support of assisted reproductive technologies: Clinical options

37Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The role of progesterone in luteal support in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) is reviewed. There is insufficient data in ART treatment without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, to prove the necessity for luteal phase support using progesterone. Prospective studies have shown that ART cycles using GnRH analogues need to be supplemented. GnRH antagonists could have some adverse effects on the luteal phase. So far, no prospective randomized comparative study has been performed to investigate the necessity for luteal phase support when antagonists are used in ART cycles. Clinical outcome data (pregnancy and abortion rates) show similar success rates for human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) or progesterone supplementation. A major disadvantage of using HCG is the risk of maintaining or enhancing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Of the several routes of administration of progesterone, the vaginal route is preferred because of its ease of use, reduced side-effects and, most importantly, the first uterine pass effect.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Posaci, C., Smitz, J., Camus, M., Osmanagaoglu, K., & Devroey, P. (2000). Progesterone for the luteal support of assisted reproductive technologies: Clinical options. Human Reproduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_1.129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free