Continuous arteriovenous haemofiltration and respiratory function in multiple organ systems failure

42Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To determine what change in respiratory function occurred following prolonged and efficient continuous arteriovenous haemofiltration (CAVH) in a group of patients with multiple organ systems failure (MOSF). Design: A retrospective assessment using patient notes and ICU charts. Setting: The Intensive Care Unit of a large University Teaching Hospital. Patients: All ICU patients satisfying the following criteria: (i) Failure of more than one organ system; (ii) Treatment with CAVH; (iii) Removal of more than 10 l of ultrafiltrate per day; (iv) Continuous haemofiltration for at least 5 days. Thirteen patients satisfied these criteria and 14 episodes of CAVH were analyzed. Measurements: All data were recorded from the patient notes and ICU charts apart from the A-aDO2 and PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio which were calculated from available values. A mean of 3.5 different organ systems failed during the period of stay. The mean daily ultrafiltrate volume obtained was 23.7 (SD 0.95) 1 and the mean duration of treatment 9.5 (SD 4.3) days. Significant improvements occurred in the values for the PF ratio and ventilatory modality (p<0.05), and the FiO2 and A-aDO2 (p=0.001). The mean PEEP value remained unchanged at 4.8 cmH2O. Ten of the 13 patients subsequently died (77% mortality). Conclusions: A significant improvement in respiratory function occurred in patients with MOSF who had undergone a prolonged period of intense CAVH. Haemofiltration may therefore be a useful treatment for respiratory failure in this patient group. Unfortunately the overall mortality of the group remained high. © 1992 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bagshaw, O. N. T., Anaes, F. R. C., & Hutchinson, A. (1992). Continuous arteriovenous haemofiltration and respiratory function in multiple organ systems failure. Intensive Care Medicine, 18(6), 334–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01694361

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free