Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography

195Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: We investigated the feasibility of assessing coronary artery stent restenosis using a new generation 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography-scanner (MDCT) in comparison to conventional quantitative angiography. Methods and results: MDCT was performed in 64 consecutive patients (mean age 58±10 years) with previously implanted coronary artery stents (102 stented lesions: mean stent diameter 3.17±0.38 mm). Each stent was classified as 'evaluable' or 'unevaluable', and in evaluable stents, the presence of in-stent restenosis (diameter reduction >50%) was determined visually. Results were verified against invasive, quantitative coronary angiography. Fifty-nine stented lesions (58%) were classified as evaluable in MDCT. The mean diameter of evaluable stents was 3.28±0.40 mm, whereas the mean diameter of non-evaluable stents was 3.03±0.31 mm (P=0.0002). Overall, six of 12 in-stent restenoses were correctly detected by MDCT [50% sensitivity (confidence interval 22-77%)] and in 51 of 90 lesions, in-stent restenosis was correctly ruled out [57% specificity (46-67%)]. In evaluable stents, six of seven in-stent restenoses were correctly detected, and the absence of in-stent stenosis was correctly identified in 51 of 52 cases [sensitivity 86% (42-99%) and specificity 98% (88-100%)]. Conclusion: Stent type and diameter influence evaluability concerning in-stent restenosis by MDCT. The rate of assessable stents is low, but in evaluable stents, accuracy for detection of in-stent restenosis can be high. © The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rixe, J., Achenbach, S., Ropers, D., Baum, U., Kuettner, A., Ropers, U., … Anders, K. (2006). Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. European Heart Journal, 27(21), 2567–2572. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free