Technology as prospective ontology

25Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Starting from common-sense notions of 'furniture of the world' a process ontology is developed in which prospective is an integral part. Technology as configurations that work (precariously) embodies expectations which structure further development. Examples (a cloned puppy, hotel keys, DC airplanes, stem cells, and overpasses on Long Island) are used to develop the notion of material narratives that are "written", not just by engineers and designers/producers, but also by users: "reading" implies some further "writing". In contrast to prevailing notions of technological control (through manipulation of building blocks), the "writing" of nanotechnology is modulation of the invisible and impredictable - an extreme example of unruly technology and repair work after the fact, where in practice control is a gesture not so different from magic. Because ontology cannot be other than prospective, it is political throughout. Thus, prospective technology highlights ontological politics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rip, A. (2009). Technology as prospective ontology. Synthese, 168(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9449-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free