Effect of iron supplementation on incidence of infectious illness in children: Systematic review

253Citations
Citations of this article
239Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of iron supplementation on the incidence of infections in children. Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Data sources: 28 randomised controlled trials (six unpublished and 22 published) on 7892 children. Interventions: Oral or parenteral iron supplementation or fortified formula milk or cereals. Outcomes: Incidence of all recorded infectious illnesses, and individual illnesses, including respiratory tract infection, diarrhoea, malaria, other infections, and prevalence of positive smear results for malaria. Results: The pooled estimate (random effects model) of the incidence rate ratio (iron v placebo) was 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.08, P=0.54; P <0.0001 for heterogeneity). The incidence rate difference (iron minus placebo) for all recorded illnesses was 0.06 episodes/child year (-0.06 to 0.18, P=0.34; P <0.0001 for heterogeneity). However, there was an increase in the risk of developing diarrhoea (incidence rate ratio 1.11, 1.01 to 1.23, P=0.04), but this would not have an overall important on public health (incidence rate difference 0.05 episodes/child year, -0.03 to 0.13; P=0.21). The occurrence of other illnesses and positive results on malaria smears (adjusted for positive smears at baseline) were not significantly affected by iron administration. On meta-regression, the statistical heterogeneity could not be explained by the variables studied. Conclusion: Iron supplementation has no apparent. harmful effect on the overall incidence of infectious illnesses in children, though it slightly increases the risk of developing diarrhoea.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gera, T., & Sachdev, H. P. S. (2002). Effect of iron supplementation on incidence of infectious illness in children: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 325(7373), 1142–1144. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free