Midface Reconstruction: Planning and Outcome

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reconstruction of the complex anatomy and aesthetics of the midface is often a challenge. A careful understanding of this three-dimensional (3D) structure is necessary. Anticipating the extent of excision and its planning following oncological resections is critical. In the past over two decades, with the advances in microsurgical procedures, contributions toward the reconstruction of this area have generated interest. Planning using digital imaging, 3D printed models, osseointegrated implants, and low-profile plates, has favorably impacted the outcome. However, there are still controversies in the management: to use single composite tissues versus multiple tissues; implants versus autografts; vascularized versus nonvascularized bone; prosthesis versus reconstruction. This article explores the present available options in maxillary reconstruction and outlines the approach in the management garnered from past publications and experiences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biswas, G. (2020). Midface Reconstruction: Planning and Outcome. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 53(3), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721870

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free