How Do Different Image Modules Impact the Accuracy of Working Length Measurements in Digital Periapical Radiography? An In Vitro Study

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of digital dental radiography in determining working length in root canal treatment via various image modules. Methods: A total of 40 intact single-rooted, single-canal human premolar teeth were examined. Following meticulous cleaning, the teeth were placed in a maxillary premolar socket within a dry human skull. X-ray images were systematically captured via a Carestream RVG digital sensor under standardized conditions. The digital images are processed under five distinct image modules: 1. original module, 2. autoenhancement module, 3. autoenhancement+negative module, 4. negative module, 5. colored module. Three calibrated observers determined the working length of each digital radiograph after the specified image modules were applied. The agreement between the actual working length and the lengths determined by the observers was evaluated via Pearson correlation analysis. A significance level of 0.05 was set for the statistical tests. Results: A high level of intra- and interobserver agreement, with a strong correlation between the actual measurements and all image module groups, was obtained (p < 0.001). The original image module group demonstrated the highest compatibility (ICC = 0.940, r = 0.912), whereas the colored image module group exhibited the lowest compatibility (ICC = 0.924, r = 0.879) with the actual measurement. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the accuracy of digital radiography in determining working length through the application of various image modules, with the original image module exhibiting the closest alignment to actual working lengths. These findings support the continued use and further development of computer-based image processing tools to optimize clinical outcomes in root canal therapy.