“It must be rock strong!” Guanxi's impact on judicial decision making in China

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Drawing upon data interviews with Chinese judges who were involved in the decision-making process, we develop two variables for analyzing the influence of social ties, or guanxi, in the judicial setting. The first differentiates the strength of guanxi-whether it is strong or weak. The second distinguishes whether the guanxi source is from a supervisor who has a role in affecting the benefit or the career development of the target judge. We argue that instead of working independently, these two variables interact and often mutually reinforce. With this typology, we contrast the means and outcomes of four types of guanxi. This Article deepens scholarly understanding of the operation of guanxi in Chinese courts. Our framework explains why shady practices that fuel favoritism and undermine the development of legal professionalism are difficult to pin down and stamp out. Everywhere we are embedded in guanxi. Indeed, guanxi has become part of our lives. We make use of guanxi; as a chain of the network, we are also being used by others in guanxi. A Trial Judge from Hinterland China.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, X., & Ng, K. H. (2017). “It must be rock strong!” Guanxi’s impact on judicial decision making in China. American Journal of Comparative Law, 65(4), 841–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avx041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free