A randomized comparison of midazolam and diazepam injectable emulsion in cataract surgery

13Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the psychomotor recovery of patients sedated with either midazolam or Diazemuls using the digit symbol substitution test and the Trieger test. Sixty patients were allocated in random double-blind fashion to receive either midazolam or diazepam in oil emulsion (Diazemuls) as intravenous sedation for cataract surgery. Both groups received fentanyl 0.5 μg· kg-1 IV. Tests of cognition were performed by the patients prior to sedation and at half-hourly intervals for three hours after cataract surgery. In a dose ratio of 1:4, midazolam was found to produce better sedation but more prolonged recovery than Diazemuls. Anterograde amnesia was comparable in the two groups, while more patients in the Diazemuls group developed episodes of apnoea and venous irritation. © 1990 Canadian Anesthesiologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chung, F., Cheng, D. C. H., Seyone, C., & Dyck, B. J. (1990). A randomized comparison of midazolam and diazepam injectable emulsion in cataract surgery. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 37(5), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03006320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free