Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndromes : The POLAR ACS study

52Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction The results of the ABSORB trial showed the efficacy and safety of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) and their unique advantage, namely, the restoration of vasomotion after full biodegradation. Objectives The aim of the registry was to evaluate procedural issues, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with BVS implantation. Patients and methods The study included 100 patients. Cohort 1 comprised 46 patients with unstable angina; cohort 2, 38 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; and cohort 3, 16 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Result s Predilation was performed in 93% of the patients. The final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow was achieved in 99% of the patients. In all patients, BVS was successfully implanted. In 81% of the patients, postdilation was performed with a balloon catheter with the same diameter as BVS; in 11%, with a balloon catheter with a diameter of 0.25 mm larger than BVS; and in 7%, with a balloon catheter with a diameter of 0.5 mm larger than BVS. We observed no no-reflow phenomenon, 1 distal embolization, and 2 slow-flow phenomena. Two major adverse cardiac events were reported, namely, periprocedural myocardial infarction in 2 patients. During 1-year follow-up, we observed only 1 additional myocardial infarction caused by stent thrombosis as well as 1 target lesion revascularization. Conclusions In our study, BVS in patients with ACS showed to be a safe and effective procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dudek, D., Rzeszutko, L., Zasada, W., Depukat, R., Siudak, Z., Ochala, A., … Gasior, M. (2014). Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndromes : The POLAR ACS study. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej, 124(12), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.2550

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free