Improvement of oil recovery factor in tight reservoirs: A laboratory approach based on carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery methods

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Production from unconventional oil reservoirs has always been a critical issue for the oil industry. In this regard, we implemented a set of experimental scenarios containing CO2/N2 cyclic injection, the foams generated by nitrogen and carbon dioxide, cyclic carbon dioxide injection, and a combined effect of carbon dioxide and surfactant enhanced oil recovery methods. As water injection has reached a plateau around two pore volume injection, we continued the tests from two pore volume injection for different scenarios. It was observed that CO2/N2-foam has the highest oil recovery factor of 34.9%; however, CO2-foam, regarding more feasibility than N2, witnessed the highest oil recovery factor after CO2/N2-foam. On the other hand, the incremental oil recovery factor for surfactant flooding, carbonated water flooding, and carbonated water with surfactant flooding is measured at 4.9, 8.5, and 10.6%, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, C., Wu, G., Huang, H., & Zhan, H. (2022). Improvement of oil recovery factor in tight reservoirs: A laboratory approach based on carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery methods. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.958830

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free