Abstract
Machine learning techniques enable computers to acquire intelligence through learning. Trained machines can carry out various tasks, such as prediction, classification, clustering, and recommendation, within a wide variety of applications. Classification is a supervised learning technique that can be improved using feature selection techniques such as filtering, wrapping, and embedding. This paper explores the impact of filtering-based feature selection techniques on classification methods, and focuses on an analysis of correlation-based filtering techniques based on Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall rank correlation. Similarly, we explore the impacts of using statistical filtering techniques such as mutual information, chi-squared score, the ANOVA univariate test, and the univariate ROC-AUC. These filtering techniques are evaluated by implementing them with the k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, decision tree, and Gaussian naïve Bayes classification methods. Our experiments were carried out using a fetal heart rate dataset, and the performance of each combination of methods was measured based on precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy. An analysis of the experimental results showed that the performance metrics for the Gaussian naïve Bayes and k-nearest neighbor methods were improved by 3% through the use of the statistical feature selection technique, and a 4% improvement was observed for the decision tree and support vector machine methods using a correlation-based filtering technique. Of the statistical feature selection techniques, ANOVA and ROC-AUC were the best as they improved the accuracy by 92%; compared to the other correlation techniques, the Spearman correlation coefficient gave the best results, as it also improved the accuracy by 92%.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jebadurai, I. J., Paulraj, G. J. L., Jebadurai, J., & Silas, S. (2022). Experimental Analysis of Filtering-Based Feature Selection Techniques for Fetal Health Classification. Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering, 19(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.2298/SJEE2202207J
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.