How Keywords Impact Word-Problem Performance: When “More” Does Not Mean to Add

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although students are often taught to look for keywords when solving word problems, this strategy is erroneous. It is especially problematic when students solve inconsistent word problems that include a relational term, such as more but are not solved with the assumed operation (e.g., addition). In this study, we analyzed constructed equations on four word problems that included the word more for 112 Grade 3 students from a U.S. southwest school district. We compared students with and without mathematics difficulty and disaggregated based on dual-language status. Most students constructed accurate equations for the two consistent word problems, but fewer constructed accurate equations for the two inconsistent word problems. Students with mathematics difficulty, particularly those who were also dual-language learners, had the lowest rates of accurate equations on the inconsistent word problems. This analysis reinforces previous calls by researchers to avoid the ineffective keywords strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardy, A. M., Douglas, G. P., MacLean, K. B., Mason, K. K., & Powell, S. R. (2026). How Keywords Impact Word-Problem Performance: When “More” Does Not Mean to Add. Learning Disability Quarterly, 49(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487251322473

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free