Abstract
Similarities and differences in the articles by Rumsey, Garfield and Chance are summarized. An alternative perspective on the distinction between statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking is presented. Based on this perspective, an example is provided to illustrate how literacy, reasoning and thinking can be promoted within a single topic of instruction. Additional examples of assessment items based on the perspective are offered. The author concludes with implications for statistics education research that stem from the incorporation of recommendations made by Rumsey, Garfield and Chance into classroom practice.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
delMas, R. C. (2002). Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking: A Commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910674
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.