Incongruence between residential uses and perceptions of fertilizers and deicers

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Fertilizers and deicers are common materials for property maintenance in the Midwest, however, their application contributes to negative environmental impacts when applied incorrectly. While fertilizer use is well researched, deicer use on private properties is not. This research aims to ascertain whether patterns of fertilizer use are different from those of deicer use in Hamilton County, Ohio, and determine what factors influence a resident’s decision to use these materials. Survey data were collected from 110 single-family households (38.9% response rate). Respondents are motivated by property appearance to apply fertilizers. Deicer use stems from safety concerns. Respondents were significantly more likely to consider the environmental impact of fertilizers than deicers. Respondents felt that using deicers is a more neighborly practice while using fertilizers reflects more positively on them in their neighborhood. This information can be used to develop outreach programs to reduce the environmental impacts of fertilizers and deicers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Craska, H. D., & Davis, A. Y. (2024). Incongruence between residential uses and perceptions of fertilizers and deicers. PLoS ONE, 19(7 July). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306550

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free