How to Optimize Pedicle Screw Parameters for the Thoracic Spine? A Biomechanical and Finite Element Method Study

20Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study Design: Pedicle screw study. Objective: The selection of pedicle screw parameters usually involves the surgeon’s analysis of preoperative CT imaging along with anatomical landmarks and tactile examination. However, there is minimal consensus on a standardized guideline for selection methods on pedicle screws. We aimed to determine the effects of thoracic screw diameter to pedicle width on pullout strength determined by cortical bone purchase. Methods: Biomechanical study performed with human cadaveric thoracic vertebrae and experimentally validated three-dimensional finite element model instrumented with pedicle screws of various diameters. We used a variable (SD/PW) ratio to express the screw selection. We hypothesized a positive correlation between the pullout load determined by the bone purchase and the SD/PW. This relationship was first investigated in a validated finite element model considering bone purchase related to the strength of an upper thoracic vertebra. Then, the correlation to the entire spine is evaluated. Results: The failure load ranged from 371.3 to 1601.0 N, respectively, for 3 and 6 mm screws. The determinant coefficient was increased to R2=.421 when a linear relationship between pullout load and the SD/PW ratio was used. The peak loads of 1216 and 1288N were found for an SD/PW ratio of.83. Conclusion: We have found that the screw pullout load is more correlated to SD/PW than other pedicle measures for a maximized SD/PW ratio of.83. This particular value should be considered the upper limit of the indicated SD/PW ratio and a means to determine the optimal screw diameter to enhance pullout strength.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Solitro, G. F., Welborn, M. C., Mehta, A. I., & Amirouche, F. (2024). How to Optimize Pedicle Screw Parameters for the Thoracic Spine? A Biomechanical and Finite Element Method Study. Global Spine Journal, 14(1), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221099470

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free