Price Indices Rekindled, 1970s–1990s: Theory and Practice at Cross Purposes?

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper revisits the discussions on price indices during a period marked by theoretical advancements and practical challenges in measuring inflation. Index-number theorists sought to improve accuracy, yet national statistical offices largely maintained established practices due to concerns over data availability, stability, and public trust. The paper explores key contributions, including the Boskin Commission's findings on biases in the consumer price index (CPI) and the role of international guidelines in shaping practice. Despite significant theoretical progress in areas such as substitution effects, quality change, and data collection, methodological conservatism persisted. The study highlights the complex interplay between economic theory, statistical methodology, and political considerations in the construction of price indices, emphasizing that while accuracy is paramount in theory, pragmatism often dictates practice. This paper makes a contribution to the existing literature by integrating a theoretical survey with an examination of the political economy of measurement inertia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cruz-e-Silva, V., & Balk, B. M. (2026). Price Indices Rekindled, 1970s–1990s: Theory and Practice at Cross Purposes? Journal of Economic Surveys, 40(2), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free