Analysis of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and ozonated water against biofilm in oval canals

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This in vitro study compared the antimicrobial efficacy of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCI) and 8 pg/mL ozonated water agitated by passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) or PUI combined with EndoActivator (EA) against mature multispecies biofilm. One hundred and five oval-shaped mandibular premolars were instrumented, sterilized, and inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Staphylococcus aureus, divided into: Control group - saline; O3 group - ozonated water; O3 PUI group - ozonated water with PUI agitation; O3 PUI+EA group - ozonated water with PUI+EA agitation; NaOCI group - NaOCI; NaOCI PUI group - NaOCI with PUI agitation; and NaOCI PUI+EA group - NaOCI with PUI+EA agitation. Microbiological samples were collected before (Si) and after (S2) the disinfection procedures and the data were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. In the culture method, there was significant disinfection in the O3 PUI+EA, NaOCI, NaOCI PUI, and NaOCI PUI+EA groups (p<0.05). The combination of NaOCI with PUI+EA reduced microbial counts to zero (p<0.05). In the qPCR method, there was a significant reduction in the total count of viable microorganisms in the O3 PUI, O3 PUI+EA, NaOCI, NaOCI PUI, and NaOCI PUI+EA groups (p<0.05). It can be concluded that 2.5% NaOCI with and without agitation, as well as 8 pg/mL ozonated water with its action enhanced by the agitation techniques, were effective in root canal disinfection, and their antimicrobial efficacy is related to the microorganisms present in the biofilm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merçon, I. R., De Campos, F. U. F., Fontana, C. E., Pelegrine, R. A., De Martin, A. S., & Da Silveira Bueno, C. E. (2023). Analysis of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and ozonated water against biofilm in oval canals. Brazilian Dental Journal, 34(3), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305318

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free