Double blind cross-over placebo controlled study of omeprazole in the treatment of patients with reflux symptoms and physiological levels of acid reflux - The 'sensitive oesophagus'

229Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background - At least 10-15% of patients with reflux symptoms have a normal endoscopy and physiological levels of acid reflux on pH monitoring. Such patients with 50% or more of symptoms associated with acid reflux episodes have 'a positive symptom index' (SI), and it has been proposed that this defines the 'sensitive oesophagus'. Aim - To test the response to omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for four weeks of patients with normal levels of acid reflux using a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, cross-over design. Patients - Eighteen patients with normal levels of reflux, 12 of whom had a positive SI. Methods - Response was measured by symptomatic assessment and the SF-36 quality of life (QOL) questionnaire. Results - Patients with a positive SI showed the following improvements on omeprazole compared with placebo: decrease in symptom frequency (p<0.01), severity (p<0.01) and consumption of antacids (p<0.01). In the group with a negative SI only one patient clearly improved. The QOL parameters for bodily pain (65.6 v 53.4, p=0.03) and vitality (60.6 v 48.8, p=0.049) were significantly better on omeprazole than placebo for the group overall. Conclusion - Omeprazole improves symptoms in 11 of 18 patients with normal endoscopy and pH monitoring, particularly those with a positive SI. This supports the theory that such patients have an oesophagus which is 'sensitive' to acid reflux and are part of the GORD spectrum.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watson, R. G. P., Tham, T. C. K., Johnston, B. T., & McDougall, N. I. (1997). Double blind cross-over placebo controlled study of omeprazole in the treatment of patients with reflux symptoms and physiological levels of acid reflux - The “sensitive oesophagus.” Gut, 40(5), 587–590. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.40.5.587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free