The hardness of the iconic must: Can peirce's existential graphs assist modal epistemology?

15Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Charles Peirce's diagrammatic logic - the Existential Graphs - is presented as a tool for illuminating how we know necessity, in answer to Benacerraf's famous challenge that most 'semantics for mathematics' do not 'fit an acceptable epistemology'. It is suggested that necessary reasoning is in essence a recognition that a certain structure has the particular structure that it has. This means that, contra Hume and his contemporary heirs, necessity is observable. One just needs to pay attention, not merely to individual things but to how those things are related in larger structures, certain aspects of which relations force certain other aspects to be a certain way. © The Author [2011]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Legg, C. (2012). The hardness of the iconic must: Can peirce’s existential graphs assist modal epistemology? Philosophia Mathematica, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkr005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free