Self-leadership: A multilevel review

324Citations
Citations of this article
1.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over the past 30 years substantial research has focused on the concept of self-leadership. The authors adopt a multilevel perspective to review this research at both individual and team levels of analysis. At the individual level, studies consistently show that increased self-leadership corresponds with better affective responses and improved work performance. Findings are not as consistent at the team level. Relationships between team-level self-leadership and both affective and performance outcomes appear to be moderated by contextual factors. The authors also identify internal and external forces that influence self-leadership. Among these forces, external leadership is particularly important, as self-leadership is not a complete substitute for external leadership. Specifically, external leadership in the forms of empowering leadership and shared leadership facilitate self-leadership of individuals and teams. The authors also identify a number of cross-level research questions that illustrate how future research can benefit from exploring ways that self-leadership at the individual level interacts with self-leadership at the team level. ©The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011, January). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310383911

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free