Monoblocks in root canals: A finite elemental stress analysis study

75Citations
Citations of this article
152Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim To investigate using finite element stress analysis (FEA) primary, secondary and tertiary monoblocks created either by adhesive resin sealers or by different adhesive posts and to evaluate the effect of interfaces on stress distribution in incisor models. Methodology Seven maxillary incisor FEA models representing different monoblocks using several materials were created as follows: (a) primary monoblock with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate; (b) secondary monoblock with sealer (MetaSEAL) and Resilon; (c) tertiary monoblock with EndoREZ; (d) primary monoblock with polyethylene fibre post-core (Ribbond); (e) secondary monoblock with glass-fibre post and resin cement; (f) tertiary monoblock with bondable glass-fibre post; (g) tertiary monoblock with silane-coated ceramic post. A 300N load was applied from the palatal surface of the crown with a 135° angle to the tooth long axis. Materials used in the study were assumed to be homogenous and isotropic except the glass-fibre post; the results are expressed in terms of von Mises criteria. Results Maximum stresses were concentrated on force application areas (18-22.1MPa). The stresses within the models increased with the number of interfaces both for the monoblocks created by the sealers (1.67-8.33MPa) and for the monoblocks created by post-core systems (1.67-11.7MPa). Conclusions Stresses within roots increased with an increase in the number of the adhesive interfaces. Creation of a primary monoblock within the root canal either by an endodontic sealer or with an adhesive post-core system can reduce the stresses that occur inside the tooth structure. © 2011 International Endodontic Journal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belli, S., Eraslan, O., Eskitascioglu, G., & Karbhari, V. (2011). Monoblocks in root canals: A finite elemental stress analysis study. International Endodontic Journal, 44(9), 817–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01885.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free