On differences between deterministic and stochastic models of chemical reactions: Schlögl solved with ZI-closure

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Deterministic and stochastic models of chemical reaction kinetics can give starkly different results when the deterministic model exhibits more than one stable solution. For example, in the stochastic Schlögl model, the bimodal stationary probability distribution collapses to a unimodal distribution when the system size increases, even for kinetic constant values that result in two distinct stable solutions in the deterministic Schlögl model. Using zero-information (ZI) closure scheme, an algorithm for solving chemical master equations, we compute stationary probability distributions for varying system sizes of the Schlögl model. With ZI-closure, system sizes can be studied that have been previously unattainable by stochastic simulation algorithms. We observe and quantify paradoxical discrepancies between stochastic and deterministic models and explain this behavior by postulating that the entropy of non-equilibrium steady states (NESS) is maximum.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vlysidis, M., & Kaznessis, Y. N. (2018). On differences between deterministic and stochastic models of chemical reactions: Schlögl solved with ZI-closure. Entropy, 20(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/e20090678

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free