Meta-research: Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability

18Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines why many studies fail to replicate statistically significant published results. We address this issue within a general statistical framework that also allows us to include various questionable research practices (QRPs) that are thought to reduce replicability. The analyses indicate that the base rate of true effects is the major factor that determines the replication rate of scientific results. Specifically, for purely statistical reasons, replicability is low in research domains where true effects are rare (e.g., search for effective drugs in pharmacology). This point is under-appreciated in current scientific and media discussions of replicability, which often attribute poor replicability mainly to QRPs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2020). Meta-research: Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability. ELife, 9, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.7554/ELIFE.58237

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free