Comparison of imipenem and ceftazidime as therapy for severe melioidosis

172Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An open, prospective, randomized, comparative treatment trial was conducted to compare the therapeutic efficacy of high-dose intravenous imipenem and ceftazidime for acute severe melioidosis. Adult Thai patients with suspected acute, severe melioidosis were randomized to receive either imipenem, at a dosage of 50 mg/(kg · d), or ceftazidime, at a dosage of 120 mg/(kg · d), for a minimum of 10 days. The main outcome measures were death or treatment failure. Of the 296 patients enrolled, 214 had culture-confirmed melioidosis, and 132 (61.7%) of them had positive blood cultures. Mortality among patients with melioidosis was 36,9% overall. There were no differences in survival overall (P = .96) or after 48 hours (P = .3). Treatment failure after 48 hours was more common among patients treated with ceftazidime (P = .011). Both treatments were well tolerated. Imipenem is a safe and effective treatment for acute severe melioidosis and may be considered an alternative to ceftazidime.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simpson, A. J. H., Suputtamongkol, Y., Smith, M. D., Angus, B. J., Rajanuwong, A., Wuthiekanun, V., … White, N. J. (1999). Comparison of imipenem and ceftazidime as therapy for severe melioidosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 29(2), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1086/520219

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free