Internal or external wall diameter for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening?

35Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The national abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme measures internal wall diameter; however, current UK intervention criteria use external wall diameter. Our aim was to determine the clinical significance of the difference between these two measurements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients on an aneurysm surveillance programme were ultrasound scanned by two experienced vascular scientists, blinded to the other's results. Maximum anteroposterior internal wall and maximum anteroposterior external wall diameters were measured. RESULTS: The median difference between internal and external diameter was 6 mm (IQR 6-7) for scientist 1 and 7 mm (IQR 5-8) for scientist 2. This was statistically significant (P < 0.0002). External wall diameter displayed less interobserver variability (3 mm vs 6 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Screening measurements underestimate aneurysm size by 6 mm and display greater variability in comparison to external wall measurements. These findings should be understood to prevent a delay in the detection and treatment of AAAs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thapar, A., Cheal, D., Hopkins, T., Ward, S., Shaloub, J., & Yusuf, S. W. (2010). Internal or external wall diameter for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 92(6), 503–505. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588410X12699663903430

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free