Accuracy of estimates of atmospheric large-scale energy flux divergence.

14Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A short review of atmospheric energy transport studies is given, and the importance of the Global Weather Experiment for such studies is emphasized. The accuracy of energy flux (divergence) estimates is then discussed, comparing results obtained for February 1979 and from two independent sets of analyses using the same procedures. It is concluded that at present the uncertainty in estimates of the zonally averaged monthly mean poleward transport of (dry static) energy is of the order 1 X 1015 W, being less in the extratropics than in the tropics. The results indicate that the accuracy in the estimation of the global distribution of diabatic heating has been much improved by the Global Weather Experiment. This accuracy is, however, not yet good enough for the satellite/atmospheric measurement method ('Oort-Vonder Haar method') to be useful for oceanographic purposes. Future progress in our ability to diagnose atmospheric heat sources and sinks is intimately tied to progress in the development of data assimilation methods. -Authors

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holopainen, E., & Fortelius, C. (1986). Accuracy of estimates of atmospheric large-scale energy flux divergence. Monthly Weather Review, 114(10), 1910–1921. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<1910:AOEOAL>2.0.CO;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free