The relationship between perfectionism and self-esteem in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Perfectionism dimensions, including perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns, have a significant positive association with psychopathology. Clinical perfectionism is defined as when an individual’s self-esteem is excessively reliant on meeting high standards despite negative consequences. Numerous studies have found that higher perfectionistic concerns correlate with lower self-esteem; however, evidence for the association with perfectionistic strivings has been mixed. Aims: The focus of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to inform theoretical understanding of the relationships between perfectionism dimensions and self-esteem in adults. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, PsycINFO, PsychARTICLES, ProQuest Central, and Scopus on 31 May 2023. Results: There were 83 articles included, with 32,304 participants (Mage = ∼24.66 years). There was a significant negative moderate pooled association between self-esteem and perfectionistic concerns, r = –.42, 95% CI [–0.47 to –0.38]. A significant negligible positive pooled association was found between self-esteem and perfectionistic strivings, r = .06, 95% CI [0.01 to 0.11]. Results indicate higher perfectionistic concerns is associated with lower self-esteem, providing indirect support for the cognitive-behavioural model of clinical perfectionism. Conclusions: Future research should compare cognitive behaviour therapy for perfectionism to treatments for low self-esteem on outcomes of perfectionistic concerns and psychopathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khossousi, V., Greene, D., Shafran, R., Callaghan, T., Dickinson, S., & Egan, S. J. (2024). The relationship between perfectionism and self-esteem in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 52(6), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465824000249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free