Antiseptic and antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infection

88Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A collection of 802 isolates of Gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infection was made from general practice, antenatal clinics, and local hospitals. The organisms were tested for their sensitivity to chlorhexidine, cetrimide, glutaraldehyde, phenyl mercuric nitrate, a phenolic formulation, and a proprietary antiseptic containing a mixture of picloxydine, octyl phenoxy polyethoxyethanol, and benzalkonium chloride. Escherichia coli, the major species isolated, proved to be uniformly sensitive to these agents. Approximately 10% of the total number of isolates, however, exhibited a degree of resistance to the cationic agents. These resistant organisms were members of the genera Proteus, Providencia, and Pseudomonas'; they were also generally resistant to 5, 6, or 7 antibiotics. It is proposed therefore that an antiseptic policy which involves the intensive use of cationic antiseptics might lead to the selection of a flora of notoriously drug-resistant species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stickler, D. J., & Thomas, D. B. (1980). Antiseptic and antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infection. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 33(3), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.33.3.288

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free