Psychosocial factors and physical activity as predictors of fruit and vegetable intake in college students

7Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze whether psychosocial factors and physical activity are predictors of fruit and vegetable intake in young adults attending college. Methods: This cross-sectional study included a representative sample of students from a public university in the Brazilian Northeast (n=717). Fruit and vegetable intake was measured by a Food Frequency Questionnaire containing 21 items. The psychosocial factors for behavior change, measured by a questionnaire, were: behavior change strategy, self-efficacy, perceived barriers and facilitators in decision making, and social support. The level of physical activity was measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Multiple linear regression was the intake prediction model using a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05). Results: The median fruit and vegetable intake was 2.0 servings/day. In adjusted analysis, behavior change strategy (R2=0.31), self-efficacy (R2=0.03), friends, support (R2=0.02), and physical activity (R2=0.03) explained 39% of the fruit and vegetable intake variance in men. Behavior change strategy (R2=0.03), self-efficacy (R2=0.13), perceived barriers (R2=0.08), and physical activity (R2=0.02) explained 26% of the fruit and vegetable intake variance in women. Fruit and vegetable intake would increase by one serving for every extra 35 and 47 minutes of physical activity men and women, respectively, practice a day. Conclusion: The main predictors of fruit and vegetable intake are behavior change strategies, self-efficacy, and physical activity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tassitano, R. M., Martins, C. M. de L., Cabral, P. C., Mota, J., Tenório, M. C. M., & Da Silva, G. A. P. (2016). Psychosocial factors and physical activity as predictors of fruit and vegetable intake in college students. Revista de Nutricao, 29(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-98652016000200003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free