Evaluating and improving semi-analytic modelling of dust in galaxies based on radiative transfer calculations

53Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The treatment of dust attenuation is crucial in order to compare the predictions of galaxy formation models with multiwavelength observations. Most past studies have used either simple analytic prescriptions or full radiative transfer (RT) calculations. Here, we couple star formation histories and morphologies predicted by the semi-analytic galaxy formation model morgana with RT calculations from the spectrophotometric and dust code grasil to create a library of galaxy spectral energy distributions from the UV/optical through the far-infrared, and compare the predictions of the RT calculations with analytic prescriptions. We consider a low- and high-redshift sample, as well as an additional library constructed with empirical, non-cosmological star formation histories and simple (pure bulge or disc) morphologies. Based on these libraries, we derive fitting formulae for the effective dust optical depth as a function of galaxy physical properties such as metallicity, gas mass and radius. We show that such fitting formulae can predict the V-band optical depth with a scatter smaller than 0.4 dex for both the low- and high-redshift samples, but there is a large galaxy-to-galaxy scatter in the shapes of attenuation curves, probably due to geometrical variations, which our simple recipe does not capture well. However, our new recipe provides a better approximation to the grasil results at optical wavelength than standard analytic prescriptions from the literature, particularly at high redshift. © 2008 RAS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fontanot, F., Somerville, R. S., Silva, L., Monaco, P., & Skibba, R. (2009). Evaluating and improving semi-analytic modelling of dust in galaxies based on radiative transfer calculations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 392(2), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14126.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free