Abstract
Purpose: We conducted a systematic review of literature published on January 2000–May 2017 that spatially linked electronic health record (EHR) data with environmental information for population health research. Methods: We abstracted information on the environmental and health outcome variables and the methods and data sources used. Results: The automated search yielded 669 articles; 128 articles are included in the full review. The number of articles increased by publication year; the majority (80%) were from the United States, and the mean sample size was approximately 160,000. Most articles used cross-sectional (44%) or longitudinal (40%) designs. Common outcomes were health care utilization (32%), cardiometabolic conditions/obesity (23%), and asthma/respiratory conditions (10%). Common environmental variables were sociodemographic measures (42%), proximity to medical facilities (15%), and built environment and land use (13%). The most common spatial identifiers were administrative units (59%), such as census tracts. Residential addresses were also commonly used to assign point locations, or to calculate distances or buffer areas. Conclusions: Future research should include more detailed descriptions of methods used to geocode addresses, focus on a broader array of health outcomes, and describe linkage methods. Studies should also explore using longitudinal residential address histories to evaluate associations between time-varying environmental variables and health outcomes.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Schinasi, L. H., Auchincloss, A. H., Forrest, C. B., & Diez Roux, A. V. (2018, July 1). Using electronic health record data for environmental and place based population health research: a systematic review. Annals of Epidemiology. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.008
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.