Influence of Luseogliflozin on Vaginal Bacterial and Fungal Populations in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, known to lower the blood glucose levels by promoting the urinary glucose excretion, can predispose to genitourinary infections. This prospective study investigated the influence of selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors luseogliflozin on the vaginal flora of the pre- and postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Twelve premenopausal and 24 postmenopausal female Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus took luseogliflozin 2.5 mg once daily for 6 months. The intravaginal fungal and bacterial populations, together with the body weight and serum parameters of diabetes mellitus and lipid metabolism were measured before and after the treatment. Results: After luseogliflozin treatment, the body weight, body mass index and hemoglobin A1c decreased, and the serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased significantly. Luseogliflozin treatment revealed to increase vaginal colony concentrations of Enterococcus faecalis (P = 0.0077) and E. coli (P = 0.0201) in premenopausal patients, and Enterococcus faecalis (P = 0.0051) and Candida albicans (P = 0.0355) in postmenopausal patients. In both pre- and postmenopausal patients, colony concentrations of Staphylococcus spp. had decreased (P = 0.0261 and P = 0.0161). Conclusions: Treatment with selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors luseogliflozin was associated with changes of the vaginal flora. These findings provide basic data on the increased susceptibility to genital infections during luseogliflozin treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kusunoki, M., Tsutsumi, K., Wakazono, N., Hisano, F., & Miyata, T. (2021). Influence of Luseogliflozin on Vaginal Bacterial and Fungal Populations in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 13(5), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4504

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free