Picky predicates: why believe doesn’t like interrogative complements, and other puzzles

28Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is a long-standing puzzle why predicates like believe embed declarative but not interrogative complements (e.g., Bill believes that/*whether Mary left) and why predicates like wonder embed interrogative but not declarative complements (e.g., Bill wonders whether/*that Mary left). This paper shows how the selectional restrictions of a range of predicates (neg-raising predicates like believe, truth-evaluating predicates like be true, inquisitive predicates like wonder, and predicates of dependency like depend on) can be derived from semantic assumptions that can be independently motivated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Theiler, N., Roelofsen, F., & Aloni, M. (2019). Picky predicates: why believe doesn’t like interrogative complements, and other puzzles. Natural Language Semantics, 27(2), 95–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-019-09152-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free