The Importance of Considering Clinical Utility in the Construction of a Diagnostic Manual

30Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The development of major diagnostic manuals primarily has been guided by construct validity rather than clinical utility. The purpose of this article is to summarize recent research and theory examining the importance of clinical utility when constructing and evaluating a diagnostic manual. We suggest that construct validity is a necessary but not sufficient criterion for diagnostic constructs. This article discusses components of clinical utility and how these have applied to the current and forthcoming diagnostic manuals. Implications and suggestions for future research are provided.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Lengel, G. J., & Deshong, H. L. (2016). The Importance of Considering Clinical Utility in the Construction of a Diagnostic Manual. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-092954

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free