Set-aside auctions and small businesses’ participation in public procurement: an empirical analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigate the effects of set-aside (SA) auctions supporting small business participation in public procurement, exploiting an original database of e-auctions for Russian granulated sugar (a largely homogeneous good) in the period 2011–2013. This affirmative action programme–as in many others similar and commonly adopted programmes by governments–records confounding effects. On the one hand, SA auctions attract more small business enterprises; on the other hand, SA auctions restrict the entry of possibly more cost-efficient large firms. Our findings highlight that SA auctions, on average, determine lower final prices for the procurer than non-SA (NSA) auctions do, although competition in SA auctions is not higher. We show that these findings depend on the reserve price intervals, supporting the effectiveness of SA auctions for small-scale procurement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shagbazian, G., Valbonesi, P., Tkachenko, A., & Shadrina, E. (2026). Set-aside auctions and small businesses’ participation in public procurement: an empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 58(5), 889–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2460745

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free